H.264 is still in a state of flux and about the only compatible systems are Ateme, Nero, x.264 (VLC's h.264), QuickTime, ffdshow, CoreAVC and I think ffmpeg.
AFAIK the MainConcept / Elecard and Cyberlink decoders are the only ones that support MBAFF today, but CoreAVC should add support for it next week.The likelyhood is that the BBC Trial (which will run for a year) will continue to use MBAFF and indeed it will be implemented for the Live Service. None of the other H264 codecs out there at the moment support MBAFF either.
I know the current container / demux situation is giving a lot of directshow developers a head ache. The MainConcept filters don’t seem to be half as stroppy about the mediatype IDs as the rest though so whatever theories they are working to it is helping, in the short term at least…To me right now MPEG-TS is rather logical and PS for the optical disk, but you must realize that that statement does make Main Concepts theories appear correct.
Amen to that! I’m sure hundreds of others feel the same, we live in hope…This would be a perfect opportunity for the VLC team to get a leap on the commercial players … it would be great if we could continue to use VLC to watch this programming.
I haven't followed this since Feb or Mar 06. I have heard bits and pieces here and there, But nothing is working yet and compatibility here is the main issue. Main Concepts and Elcard do not seem to have compatibility with each other or with the VideoLAN x.264 and Ateme.AFAIK the MainConcept / Elecard and Cyberlink decoders are the only ones that support MBAFF today, but CoreAVC should add support for it next week.
Yes! The source appears to be the same on both counts, but individually not collectively. IE Nero, QuickTime and Ateme are the same source Ateme and Mplayer, ffmpeg and VLC are the VideoLAN teem, except CoreAVC (I think). But they don't have an encoder yet. I haven't seen a working decoder from Interlink. They are advertising it!I didn't think QuickTime supported MBAFF at all? BTW, aren’t the Ahead/Nero and Ateme decoders one and the same? Come to think of it aren’t the MainConcept / Elecard and Intervideo / VideoSoft H.264 decoders just clones as well? Please correct we if I'm wrong guys, I'm just wondering if I’ve missed something???
Actually, hold on …dons asbestos flame suit… but aren’t VLC / x264 / FFDshow / FFMpeg all based on the same H.264 code??? What about Xine and Mplayer? They all seem to display the same problems with MBAFF decoding?
This is why I brought it up! Hopping that someone would start thinking about it. Rather than people like CoreAVC that don't seem to care or at least at the moment.I know the current container / demux situation is giving a lot of directshow developers a head ache. The MainConcept filters don’t seem to be half as stroppy about the mediatype IDs as the rest though so whatever theories they are working to it is helping, in the short term at least…
This would be a perfect opportunity for the VLC team to get a leap on the commercial players … it would be great if we could continue to use VLC to watch this programming.
Amen to that! I’m sure hundreds of others feel the same, we live in hope…
when you refer to BR and HDDVD i assumeI don't think you really have any argument from me! With 24 satellites in space by the end of next year with 24 stations per transponder H.264 is poised to be a great system when it is finalized. I think streaming, features and container type are still kind of up in the air (no pun intended) beside the standard itself. Probably the biggest argument is going to be by the professionals over retooling costs versus add ons for the MPEG container. From this stand point everyone is wondering about the HD DVD versus the Blue Ray. Do I need to retool twice? Does this make Main Concepts the early leader? Then what does the consumer really want from this new technology. Most couch potatoes would want a remote with PVR like features in real time. Any early adopters surely would have the jump on the rest as the first hurtle is finishing h.264 so that it streams well and maintains the quality, resolution, reliability and offers some wonderful features in the container. We all have great expectations for it. I still haven't seen any AAC S/PDIF answers and it seems to me this should be easier than finishing h.264
I would like to see VLC support the Matroska container for transcode functions so that we would have the opportunity to play with this using h.264 in streams. Although this may not prove be a good streaming solution. To me right now MPEG-TS is rather logical and PS for the optical disk, but you must realize that that statement does make Main Concepts theories appear correct.
i ment to point you to vc1 doom thread for the standards announcment bit this will do.its rather odd that there dont seem to be Mpeg4/AVC dvd around yet though, especially considering the UK/EU comitment
to Mpeg4/AVC broadcasting.
for the better compression/etc Mpeg4/AVC standard, then it looks like both the old school amiga 3rd party companays
Main Concept and NewTek especially are leading the way in both hardware and software for the industry
http://www.mainconcept.com/site/index.php?id=4202
http://www.pluginz.com/news/513
NAB 1006 looks good for both companys
http://www.mainconcept.com/site/
but you should check out NewTeks NAB 2006 stuff
http://www.newtek.com/shows/nab/2006/
really top class if your a pro im told.
The AVI muxer in VLC is considered broken. Personally I don't believe it was ever finished. So you will need to use another compatible format and encapsulation method in VLC or another program if you must have AVI. Try: videohelp.comHi, I am trying to convert a .TS H264 (MBAFF) file encoded by ATEME AVC kompressor into AVI. The problem is that VLC can read it but cannot uncompress it into AVI format. Do you know to do this or have any suggestion?
Thank you,
Return to “VLC media player for Windows Troubleshooting”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 36 guests