VLS vs VLC streaming: Why not VLS?

Discussion on the (deprecated) VideoLAN Server application as well as the miniSAPserver stream announcer. This is not about VLC!
Forum rules
Please do not post VLC related questions in this forum category. See the Forum Rules for more information.
MrExNice1979

VLS vs VLC streaming: Why not VLS?

Postby MrExNice1979 » 09 Dec 2005 13:46

Í really want to work with VLS on Linux, to support the students of a media academy.

I think it´s raelly neccessary to work with VLS as the streaming server, and not with VLC.

Can anybody explain me, why most of the people say that VLC is better? What I know, is that nobody work on the VLS since 2003 and that VLC is easier to handle.
But can I use VLC as a server on Linux? Isn't VLS stable or good enough?

Please tell me and discuss it with me. I will learn a lot of this topic in the next time so that I can help other people with their problems. ´But please don't tell me about Videolan HowTo or the other things. I know about them, but I want your (maybe other) opinions and other sources.
I think it is really necessary to get a lot of different opinions and tipps for the media world, because VLC/VLS is for free and can be a big help for all the media students and workers on LAN, all around the world.

Come on, let´s do it to another dimension :!:

Trueman

Postby Trueman » 03 Jan 2006 14:56

:shock:
well, I really enjoyed your post, but tell me, what is your problem?
Just want to discuss? there are enough topics to discuss, please explain me
what you want to discuss, then I would help you to support your idea, and hopefully some more guys...

kind regards

is it true man?!?

Guest

Postby Guest » 04 Jan 2006 12:30

For me , i love vls more than vlc . why so many people use vlc, i think is that vlc is easy to use.

dionoea
Cone Master
Cone Master
Posts: 5157
Joined: 03 Dec 2003 23:09
Location: Paris, France

Postby dionoea » 04 Jan 2006 13:40

VLC is easier to use. It handles many more formats than VLS, transcoding, more inputs... and people work on it.

VLS is good if you want dvb/network inputs and want to stream them as is in udp/ts. VLC can handle that too.
Antoine Cellerier
dionoea
(Please do not use private messages for support questions)

SARAVANA

Postby SARAVANA » 07 Feb 2006 09:59

I think vlc is good when ur using it as client ....

Vls is good when ur using it has server .......

Now many peoples are in client side .... they don't bother about server ...

moreover many ppl don't hav clear idea about how to use VLS ....

Anyone having clear idea abt vls that is how to stream both video & audio in vls and how to receive in vlc ....
unicasting multicasting and every thing ....?

Tell me clear examples .......

it will be useful to make vls uasge more easy .........

MeExNiceGuy

my problem with vls...

Postby MeExNiceGuy » 25 Apr 2006 13:00

....is that I don´t know how to do it with the time.
So when I start the server the programm will start too?
Can I handle the time?

MrExNice1979

Postby MrExNice1979 » 25 Apr 2006 13:03

Sorry, my english is bad, and the question wasn t good.
What I want to know is, can I handle the time of a media file, stored on ´the hard disc, when I stream it with vls? i don#t think so...


Return to “VideoLAN Server and miniSAPserver”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests