I do believe that a certain shown value could have changed. That does not determine that the value was what you think it was, or that any implied change is right or wrong. In fact, VLC 3 shows the number of bits per decoded sample, and that value seems correct. So if the value differs from what VLC 2.2 shows, the logical conclusion is that there was a bug in VLC 2.2, or that the decoder output format changed (in which case, the value shown by VLC 2.2 is not what you think it is), or both."allegedly" Really? You don't believe us? I could post print screens if you want......why it allegedly disappeared in VLC 3.
VLC 4 also shows the number of bits per encoded sample (where applicable), but that's a new feature of VLC 4 that was definitely not in VLC 3, nor 2.2.
It's not my own science. It's other people measuring through blind tests and other experiments the volume amplitudes that humans can perceive. And considering your attitude, I have zero interests in continuing this discussion.but you obviously don't care because your own science has spoken when you take the shortcut to state that difference between 16, 20 and 24bits is just audiophile BS.
Patch welcome, kthxbye.