I tried to update my vlc program from 2.2.4 to 2.2.6, but malwarebytes tells me " exploit payload file blocked".
Can you tell me where the problem comes from?
Thanks!
Vlc 2.2.6
Forum rules
Please post only Windows specific questions in this forum category. If you don't know where to post, please read the different forums' rules. Thanks.
Please post only Windows specific questions in this forum category. If you don't know where to post, please read the different forums' rules. Thanks.
-
Jean-Baptiste Kempf
- Site Administrator
- Posts: 37523
- Joined: 22 Jul 2005 15:29
- VLC version: 4.0.0-git
- Operating System: Linux, Windows, Mac
- Location: Cone, France
- Contact:
Re: Vlc 2.2.6
malwarebytes 
Else, always check the checksums
Else, always check the checksums
Jean-Baptiste Kempf
http://www.jbkempf.com/ - http://www.jbkempf.com/blog/category/Videolan
VLC media player developer, VideoLAN President and Sites administrator
If you want an answer to your question, just be specific and precise. Don't use Private Messages.
http://www.jbkempf.com/ - http://www.jbkempf.com/blog/category/Videolan
VLC media player developer, VideoLAN President and Sites administrator
If you want an answer to your question, just be specific and precise. Don't use Private Messages.
Re: Vlc 2.2.6
Same here from the auto download. But not from the website.
-
VLCwin7User
- Blank Cone
- Posts: 62
- Joined: 09 May 2015 06:44
Re: Vlc 2.2.6
I reinstated 2.2.4 and activated the internal downloader. Once downloaded, it asked me if I wanted to close VLC and install, and I clicked no. It is not clear whether VLC itself verifies the hashes and digital signatures prior to proceeding to upgrade.
Found vlc-2.2.6-win64.exe in my temp folder. The file is digitally signed, and checked out ok
The MD5 and SH1 hashes match what is in the http://download.videolan.org/pub/videol ... 2.6/win64/ for the .exe file.
No alert came from Windows Defender.
Reinstated VLC 2.2.6 which was already installed.
The one I checked out was the 64 bit one.
Found vlc-2.2.6-win64.exe in my temp folder. The file is digitally signed, and checked out ok
The MD5 and SH1 hashes match what is in the http://download.videolan.org/pub/videol ... 2.6/win64/ for the .exe file.
No alert came from Windows Defender.
Reinstated VLC 2.2.6 which was already installed.
The one I checked out was the 64 bit one.
Re: Vlc 2.2.6
Problem solved!I reinstated 2.2.4 and activated the internal downloader. Once downloaded, it asked me if I wanted to close VLC and install, and I clicked no. It is not clear whether VLC itself verifies the hashes and digital signatures prior to proceeding to upgrade.
Found vlc-2.2.6-win64.exe in my temp folder. The file is digitally signed, and checked out ok
The MD5 and SH1 hashes match what is in the http://download.videolan.org/pub/videol ... 2.6/win64/ for the .exe file.
No alert came from Windows Defender.
Reinstated VLC 2.2.6 which was already installed.
The one I checked out was the 64 bit one.
Thank you!
Re: Vlc 2.2.6
By the way, there are no release notes for v2.2.6 (yet).
There is nothing about it in https://www.videolan.org/developers/vlc-branch/NEWS either.
There is nothing about it in https://www.videolan.org/developers/vlc-branch/NEWS either.
-
Cog_in_the_machine
- New Cone
- Posts: 4
- Joined: 01 Apr 2011 22:06
- VLC version: 2.2.3
- Operating System: Windows
Re: Vlc 2.2.6
Came to say the same as xercer8 regarding the missing release notes for v2.2.6
Also, vlc-2.2.6-win64.7z does not contain the NSIS source files.
Because of this I have to use previous version. (need Custom file associations)
Meanwhile newer versions of vlc-2.2.6 are available as dailies.
Is 2.2.6 finished or half-baked?
Also, vlc-2.2.6-win64.7z does not contain the NSIS source files.
Because of this I have to use previous version. (need Custom file associations)
Meanwhile newer versions of vlc-2.2.6 are available as dailies.
Is 2.2.6 finished or half-baked?
Re: Vlc 2.2.6
I came across the same issue. I don't know what caused that.
Return to “VLC media player for Windows Troubleshooting”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 23 guests