Perhaps it is time to pose some questions regarding the original post. But first some statements.
The USA is in a state of Martial Law and was declared shortly after 9/11. Within days, the War on Drugs was added into the War on Terrorism. Which means we can never leave this state of Martial Law, because the war on drugs can NOT be won and perhaps the war on terrorism can also NOT be won. I find that most Americans don't remember that we went into this state as it was not widely publicized (long period of time) or what it means to us as a society.
1. It means that there are NO 1st amendment rights.
2. It means that anyone can be seized and held on suspicion of terrorism indefinitely without right of representation or trial.
3. It means that the checks and balances system set up by the Bill of Rights and the Constitution are null and void. The President is the supreme authority.
Within the Presidency of George Bush we have seen a war in the middle east under the guise of terrorism, but no terrorism has been proved to exist here. So what is this war about? The Democrats in the Senate have created a Bill to pull out of the Middle East by October of this year and are urging the President to sign it. Do you believe he will?
1. Bush has seized control of the Military through Martial Law and created Homeland Security. He has created a National ID card by linking the States Driver Licenses Bureaus together to control and recognize citizens. This has caused other issues as he violated the 5 to 7 year policy of every state and made it 20 years for records to be expunged.
2. Bush has seized control of the Gold through Homeland Security and the Military.
3. Bush has seized control of communications through the MCI incident and the cover up of Global Crossings fiasco that would have caused a global communications failure. Thus forcing all the telecoms to fall in line due to an accounting fear and route all communications through Madison Square Gardens in NYC for Homeland Security.
4. Bush has restricted travel through all means of public transportation in the name of Homeland Security.
Historically this kind of thing has only happened as a prelude to a governmental takeover as in King or Dictatorship.
So what do you think of George Bush? Do you think Tony Blair is better? Considering that the overwhelming proof of 9/11 is that the President knew and some government agencies knew and all had complicity. Does anyone still believe all of this was not a plan that hasn't seen complete fulfillment?
Or are we just going to say: "Long live King Bush"
I hope this doesn't get me banned or someone knocking on my door wanting to take me away for being a subversive (terrorist) as everything stated here is a matter of public record. It's just seldom does one see it all in one spot and ask some hard questions!