It doesn't work quite like that. DVDs and BluRay players use volume licencing and royalties to pay the necessary licence expenses. When ever there's a sale of such a player, royalties go into effect and a small % of the purchase price is paid to the relevant companies. With software, however, it's different, especially for a company like VideoLAN, which is more of a non-profit than anything else. If it wants to pay fees, it (obviously) cannot afford a constant royalty scheme. It must instead do a per-purchase licence fee, which should be enough to satisfy Dolby. Also, royalties can't work as VLC is (obviously) free. Plus, Dolby is bound and subject to the same United States licencing laws that (in)directly affect so many other people due to companies (such as Apple) having their primary business offices in the US.What I don't understand is why you are expected to pay for a codec over and over again for each app separately on any piece of hardware. If you get a dvd/blu-ray player it comes with a license for the device, not just one disc publisher. Apple must take a cut of the action.
Dolby refuses to license it.Yeah, 2.6.2 no longer has the warning in the download info, but I presume it's still missing. I'd pay $.99, and maybe more, for a new iOS version that fixes a few bugs that I reported that STILL plays the files I want to play... (Downloads from my TiVo, things like reality shows & documentaries that I watch faster than realtime with VLC.. But I'm stuck with the old version...)
Really? Not even under their normal licensing scheme?Dolby refuses to license it.Yeah, 2.6.2 no longer has the warning in the download info, but I presume it's still missing. I'd pay $.99, and maybe more, for a new iOS version that fixes a few bugs that I reported that STILL plays the files I want to play... (Downloads from my TiVo, things like reality shows & documentaries that I watch faster than realtime with VLC.. But I'm stuck with the old version...)
Yes, because we are open source. Which is a violation of their promises to authorities of having FRAND licensing of their patents.Really? Not even under their normal licensing scheme?Dolby refuses to license it.Yeah, 2.6.2 no longer has the warning in the download info, but I presume it's still missing. I'd pay $.99, and maybe more, for a new iOS version that fixes a few bugs that I reported that STILL plays the files I want to play... (Downloads from my TiVo, things like reality shows & documentaries that I watch faster than realtime with VLC.. But I'm stuck with the old version...)
Oh, OK, that's too bad.Yes, because we are open source. Which is a violation of their promises to authorities of having FRAND licensing of their patents.Really? Not even under their normal licensing scheme?Dolby refuses to license it.Yeah, 2.6.2 no longer has the warning in the download info, but I presume it's still missing. I'd pay $.99, and maybe more, for a new iOS version that fixes a few bugs that I reported that STILL plays the files I want to play... (Downloads from my TiVo, things like reality shows & documentaries that I watch faster than realtime with VLC.. But I'm stuck with the old version...)
I thought FRAND was a requirement to license to everyone at reasonable terms. Is there no way to have an optional non-open source plugin with an ios app?
Yes, because we are open source. Which is a violation of their promises to authorities of having FRAND licensing of their patents.
Agreed - what about this?I can understand not playing ac3 tracks, but... Why does vlc just error out when the content contains both aac and ac3 tracks? Why won't it play the aac and ignore the ac3?
Well 22 months is good news (sort of).Oh, OK, that's too bad.
I guess the only consolation is that the AC-3 patent will expire in 22 months. I believe Dolby derives most of their revenues from this patent which I suppose is why they so vigorously defend it.
Return to “VLC for iOS, iPadOS and Apple TV”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests