The VideoLAN Forums

Posted: **26 Jan 2004 14:28**

We tried to connect a IEEE1394 moduleto to VLS. And we tested the live streamming from IEEE1394 using JVC GR-HD1 camera.

From JVC camera to IEEE1394, the stream format is MPEG2-TS. We modified the FileReader module for testing. We used the MicroMv capture source.(http://kino.schirmacher.de/article/view/54/1/11/) It is a source for capture from IEEE1394.

What is your opinion? Is it worth adding the IEEE1394 module to VLS?

Posted: **13 Feb 2004 15:03**

As a micromv user i would have to say yes but I doubt if there are that many of us out here so is it worth the effort? I hope you think so!

Posted: **18 Mar 2005 08:09**

Hi KiYoung,
Yes I think it is very useful to me, I actually found you source over here
http://netmedia.kjist.ac.kr/research/research3_6.html
and have been trying to compile it under linux (2.6) with no success

Of course I can't get the normal VLS to compile either...
viewtopic.php?p=25098#25098
But I think what you've done is fantastic, I can only hope to see it work.

Devan

Posted: **27 Jul 2006 08:45**

We tried to connect a IEEE1394 moduleto to VLS. And we tested the live streamming from IEEE1394 using JVC GR-HD1 camera.

From JVC camera to IEEE1394, the stream format is MPEG2-TS. We modified the FileReader module for testing. We used the MicroMv capture source.(http://kino.schirmacher.de/article/view/54/1/11/) It is a source for capture from IEEE1394.

What is your opinion? Is it worth adding the IEEE1394 module to VLS?

The VideoLAN Forums

IEEE1394 module for VLS

IEEE1394 module for VLS

micromv module

Re: IEEE1394 module for VLS