Licence issue

For questions and discussion that is NOT (I repeat NOT) specific to a certain Operating System.
lazaruz
Blank Cone
Blank Cone
Posts: 16
Joined: 01 May 2007 09:48

Licence issue

Postby lazaruz » 16 Aug 2007 10:21

Hi,

I just want to be clear on the license of VLC and what I can and can not do.

I'm working on a mediaplayer using Tappens .Net Interface to interact with libvlc.
Now the thing is that I would like to use the BASS library from Un4seen for the audio and from what I have understood from other discussions here on the forum, that would be a license violation on VLC. Is this so?

I'm asking because I found another player that does what I intended to do, using VLC and BASS, namely Kantaris, http://www.kantaris.org/

In their license agreement it states, and I quote:
Kantaris consists of several software parts each with different licenses and all of which needs to be followed. A large part is code from the videolan project but since it isn’t used directly but via an activex control their GPL licence isn't violated. Read the licenses at kantaris.org/license.htm. The code written exclusively for Kantaris is licensed under the LGPL.
Now, does this apply when I use Tappens .NET Interface to or is it just the activex control?

Jean-Baptiste Kempf
Site Administrator
Site Administrator
Posts: 37523
Joined: 22 Jul 2005 15:29
VLC version: 4.0.0-git
Operating System: Linux, Windows, Mac
Location: Cone, France
Contact:

Re: Licence issue

Postby Jean-Baptiste Kempf » 18 Aug 2007 00:27

No, I am sorry, that doesn't apply to .Net interface.

Here is a good tip:

"If you need any vlc source file (code source or headers) so any .h, .c, .cpp, .hpp, .m or so on, you need to be GPL.

To use Tappen's .Net, you are using GPL headers => GPL.
Jean-Baptiste Kempf
http://www.jbkempf.com/ - http://www.jbkempf.com/blog/category/Videolan
VLC media player developer, VideoLAN President and Sites administrator
If you want an answer to your question, just be specific and precise. Don't use Private Messages.

lazaruz
Blank Cone
Blank Cone
Posts: 16
Joined: 01 May 2007 09:48

Re: Licence issue

Postby lazaruz » 21 Aug 2007 11:26

So if I switch to the ActiveX-control, then I can use BASS?

Jean-Baptiste Kempf
Site Administrator
Site Administrator
Posts: 37523
Joined: 22 Jul 2005 15:29
VLC version: 4.0.0-git
Operating System: Linux, Windows, Mac
Location: Cone, France
Contact:

Re: Licence issue

Postby Jean-Baptiste Kempf » 21 Aug 2007 12:16

To me, as far as I understand the licence, the answer is yes.
Jean-Baptiste Kempf
http://www.jbkempf.com/ - http://www.jbkempf.com/blog/category/Videolan
VLC media player developer, VideoLAN President and Sites administrator
If you want an answer to your question, just be specific and precise. Don't use Private Messages.

lazaruz
Blank Cone
Blank Cone
Posts: 16
Joined: 01 May 2007 09:48

Re: Licence issue

Postby lazaruz » 27 Aug 2007 10:01

So let me try this scenario...

I create my player as I have, using Tappens .Net Interface and make an optional plugin as a separate project that includes BASS.
Now I wont distribute the player with this plugin, it could just be added if you want to use it.

Do I still violate the license agreement?

Jean-Baptiste Kempf
Site Administrator
Site Administrator
Posts: 37523
Joined: 22 Jul 2005 15:29
VLC version: 4.0.0-git
Operating System: Linux, Windows, Mac
Location: Cone, France
Contact:

Re: Licence issue

Postby Jean-Baptiste Kempf » 30 Aug 2007 14:26

Well, if the plug-in that uses BAss is GPl, I think it is ok.
Jean-Baptiste Kempf
http://www.jbkempf.com/ - http://www.jbkempf.com/blog/category/Videolan
VLC media player developer, VideoLAN President and Sites administrator
If you want an answer to your question, just be specific and precise. Don't use Private Messages.

lazaruz
Blank Cone
Blank Cone
Posts: 16
Joined: 01 May 2007 09:48

Re: Licence issue

Postby lazaruz » 02 Sep 2007 16:10

Well, if the plug-in that uses BAss is GPl, I think it is ok.
Why would it be an issue if the plug-in is GPL or not, the plug-in is not using VLC?

Jean-Baptiste Kempf
Site Administrator
Site Administrator
Posts: 37523
Joined: 22 Jul 2005 15:29
VLC version: 4.0.0-git
Operating System: Linux, Windows, Mac
Location: Cone, France
Contact:

Re: Licence issue

Postby Jean-Baptiste Kempf » 02 Sep 2007 19:07

If you need to link your plugin with VLC, then GPL. otherwise, you don't carE.
Jean-Baptiste Kempf
http://www.jbkempf.com/ - http://www.jbkempf.com/blog/category/Videolan
VLC media player developer, VideoLAN President and Sites administrator
If you want an answer to your question, just be specific and precise. Don't use Private Messages.

lazaruz
Blank Cone
Blank Cone
Posts: 16
Joined: 01 May 2007 09:48

Re: Licence issue

Postby lazaruz » 02 Sep 2007 19:59

thanks a lot j-b, now I know what I should do

rem_s27
New Cone
New Cone
Posts: 1
Joined: 08 Aug 2007 14:15

Re: Licence issue

Postby rem_s27 » 27 Sep 2007 16:09

Hello,
I would like know. If I use libvlc.dll with GetProAdress as access way to VLC function, am i under gpl?

nrem

Jean-Baptiste Kempf
Site Administrator
Site Administrator
Posts: 37523
Joined: 22 Jul 2005 15:29
VLC version: 4.0.0-git
Operating System: Linux, Windows, Mac
Location: Cone, France
Contact:

Re: Licence issue

Postby Jean-Baptiste Kempf » 28 Sep 2007 00:29

Do you build it using VLC headers?
So I guess, you have to comply to the GPL.
Jean-Baptiste Kempf
http://www.jbkempf.com/ - http://www.jbkempf.com/blog/category/Videolan
VLC media player developer, VideoLAN President and Sites administrator
If you want an answer to your question, just be specific and precise. Don't use Private Messages.


Return to “General VLC media player Troubleshooting”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 40 guests