The VideoLAN Forums

Posted: **07 Oct 2011 10:49**

Hi everyone,

I'm trying to compile the VLC sources from the GIT repository, and the compilation fails each time with this error message:

Code: Select all

CC     libv4l2_plugin_la-video.lo
In file included from v4l2/video.c:40:
v4l2/v4l2.h:33:3: warning: #warning Please update Video4Linux2 headers!
v4l2/video.c:170: error: ‘V4L2_COLORFX_NEGATIVE’ undeclared here (not in a function)
v4l2/video.c:171: error: ‘V4L2_COLORFX_EMBOSS’ undeclared here (not in a function)
v4l2/video.c:171: error: ‘V4L2_COLORFX_SKETCH’ undeclared here (not in a function)
v4l2/video.c:171: error: ‘V4L2_COLORFX_SKY_BLUE’ undeclared here (not in a function)
v4l2/video.c:172: error: ‘V4L2_COLORFX_GRASS_GREEN’ undeclared here (not in a function)
v4l2/video.c:172: error: ‘V4L2_COLORFX_SKIN_WHITEN’ undeclared here (not in a function)
v4l2/video.c:172: error: ‘V4L2_COLORFX_VIVID’ undeclared here (not in a function)
v4l2/video.c: In function ‘InitVideo’:
v4l2/video.c:932: warning: format ‘%lx’ expects type ‘long unsigned int’, but argument 5 has type ‘v4l2_std_id’
v4l2/video.c:935: warning: format ‘%lx’ expects type ‘long unsigned int’, but argument 5 has type ‘v4l2_std_id’
make[5]: *** [libv4l2_plugin_la-video.lo] Error 1

The option --disable-libv4l2 does not prevent this. I edited the file modules/access/Modules.am and commented this line:

Code: Select all

libvlc_LTLIBRARIES += libv4l2_plugin.la

Shouldn't the disabling of libv4l2 prevent this ?

Thanks again for this great software !

Steps to reproduce the problem:
1) git pull (October 7, 2011)
2) ./configure --disable-xcb --disable-libgcrypt --disable-libv4l2
3) make

Workaround: in modules/access/Modules.am, comment the line

Code: Select all

libvlc_LTLIBRARIES += libv4l2_plugin.la

System information:
Ubuntu 10.04 x86_64
Kernel 2.6.35-25-generic
gcc 4.4.3
GNU Make 3.81

Posted: **07 Oct 2011 10:58**

--disable-libv4l2 disables libv4l2, not v4l2.

Posted: **07 Oct 2011 11:01**

Hi Rémi,

Thanks for your answer. So is there another option I can use to prevent the error ?

Posted: **07 Oct 2011 12:08**

Update kernel headers to 2.6.32 or later, I suppose.

Posted: **07 Oct 2011 12:48**

But I already do:

$: uname -r
2.6.35-25-generic

and the headers are installed.

Posted: **07 Oct 2011 14:27**

I wrote Linux kernel headers, not kernel image:

Code: Select all

dpkg -l linux-libc-dev

Posted: **07 Oct 2011 14:38**

Yes I know, the kernel image is 2.6.35-25 and the headers are installed as well:

$: apt-cache policy linux-headers-2.6.35-25

Code: Select all

linux-headers-2.6.35-25:
  Installed: 2.6.35-25.44~lucid1
  Candidate: 2.6.35-25.44~lucid1
  Version table:
 *** 2.6.35-25.44~lucid1 0
        500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid-updates/main Packages
        500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid-security/main Packages
        100 /var/lib/dpkg/status

Posted: **07 Oct 2011 15:12**

Thing is, the missing definitions were added in Linux 2.6.32. And do note that, confusingly enough, linux-libc-dev and linux-headers are different packages. I guess the first one is used for userspace and the last one for external kernel modules.

Another solution would be to manually define the missing stuff in modules/access/v4l2/v4l2.h.

Posted: **07 Oct 2011 17:47**

Hi Rémi, my linux-libc-dev is also > 2.6.32, so I do not understand why it does not work.

Code: Select all

$: dpkg -l linux-libc-dev
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
| Status=Not/Inst/Cfg-files/Unpacked/Failed-cfg/Half-inst/trig-aWait/Trig-pend
|/ Err?=(none)/Reinst-required (Status,Err: uppercase=bad)
||/ Name           Version        Description
+++-==============-==============-============================================
ii  linux-libc-dev 2.6.32-34.77   Linux Kernel Headers for development

I tried to write a patch to manually define the problematic values:

Code: Select all

--- v4l2.h.old	2011-10-07 21:50:27.634333170 +0800
+++ v4l2.h	2011-10-07 21:57:34.820791847 +0800
@@ -50,6 +50,27 @@
 # define V4L2_CID_BG_COLOR (V4L2_CID_BASE+35)
 # define V4L2_CID_ROTATE (V4L2_CID_BASE+34)
 #endif
+#ifndef V4L2_COLORFX_NEGATIVE
+# define V4L2_COLORFX_NEGATIVE 3
+#endif
+#ifndef V4L2_COLORFX_EMBOSS
+# define V4L2_COLORFX_EMBOSS 4
+#endif
+#ifndef V4L2_COLORFX_SKETCH
+# define V4L2_COLORFX_SKETCH 5
+#endif
+#ifndef V4L2_COLORFX_SKY_BLUE
+# define V4L2_COLORFX_SKY_BLUE 6
+#endif
+#ifndef V4L2_COLORFX_GRASS_GREEN
+# define V4L2_COLORFX_GRASS_GREEN 7
+#endif
+#ifndef V4L2_COLORFX_SKIN_WHITEN
+# define V4L2_COLORFX_SKIN_WHITEN 8
+#endif
+#ifndef V4L2_COLORFX_VIVID
+# define V4L2_COLORFX_VIVID 9
+#endif
 
 
 #ifdef HAVE_LIBV4L2

And I tested it with my webcam by using:

Code: Select all

$: vlc v4l2:///dev/video0

It worked, but I do not know what other tests I can do. Is there some testing you want me to try ? And would you be interested if I submit the patch ?

Cheers

Andreas

The VideoLAN Forums

Compilation of libv4l2_plugin_la-video.lo fails

Compilation of libv4l2_plugin_la-video.lo fails

Re: Compilation of libv4l2_plugin_la-video.lo fails

Re: Compilation of libv4l2_plugin_la-video.lo fails

Re: Compilation of libv4l2_plugin_la-video.lo fails

Re: Compilation of libv4l2_plugin_la-video.lo fails

Re: Compilation of libv4l2_plugin_la-video.lo fails

Re: Compilation of libv4l2_plugin_la-video.lo fails

Re: Compilation of libv4l2_plugin_la-video.lo fails

Re: Compilation of libv4l2_plugin_la-video.lo fails