VLC vs iTunes

macOS specific usage questions
marksealey
New Cone
New Cone
Posts: 9
Joined: 11 Feb 2012 23:01
VLC version: 3.0.11.1
Operating System: 10.14.6
Location: Southern California

VLC vs iTunes

Postby marksealey » 11 Feb 2012 23:47

Hello,

Old hand with classical music, Macs and iTunes. New to VLC.

I have FLAC (24-bit) files I want to play with the most realistic sound possible, please.

'mid-2011' 2.7 GHz iMac running 10.7.3. AirFoil to Airport Express; DAC to ParaSound Halo P3/A23… the best sound quality possible is what's important to me :-).

Am I right that VLC will always give me better sound (= more faithful, fuller, less colored, in the context of symphonic, vocal, choral and chamber music) than will iTunes?

- if for no other reason than iTunes' lack of support for 24-bit.

And because by playing natively in VLC I'm not converting from FLAC to Apple Lossless?

TIA!
best
--
Mark Sealey

Jean-Baptiste Kempf
Site Administrator
Site Administrator
Posts: 37523
Joined: 22 Jul 2005 15:29
VLC version: 4.0.0-git
Operating System: Linux, Windows, Mac
Location: Cone, France
Contact:

Re: VLC vs iTunes

Postby Jean-Baptiste Kempf » 12 Feb 2012 11:49

No idea :)
Jean-Baptiste Kempf
http://www.jbkempf.com/ - http://www.jbkempf.com/blog/category/Videolan
VLC media player developer, VideoLAN President and Sites administrator
If you want an answer to your question, just be specific and precise. Don't use Private Messages.

marksealey
New Cone
New Cone
Posts: 9
Joined: 11 Feb 2012 23:01
VLC version: 3.0.11.1
Operating System: 10.14.6
Location: Southern California

Re: VLC vs iTunes

Postby marksealey » 12 Feb 2012 22:04

Well, does iTunes support 24-bit?
best
--
Mark Sealey

Arite
Big Cone-huna
Big Cone-huna
Posts: 2478
Joined: 26 Jun 2007 20:40
VLC version: 3.0.20
Operating System: Debian Testing|Win10

Re: VLC vs iTunes

Postby Arite » 13 Feb 2012 17:48

I think iTunes only supports Apple Lossless (ALAC) 24-bit, so you'd have to transcode from FLAC to ALAC to playback in iTunes AFAIK.

As for the "best" sounds... probably more of a question for the people at HydrogenAudio.org :). I don't see why VLC wouldn't be as exact. It can output through S/PDIF so if you have an external DAC you could connect it that way.

VLC doesn't have gapless playback support though.

Arite.
Don't use PMs for support questions.

marksealey
New Cone
New Cone
Posts: 9
Joined: 11 Feb 2012 23:01
VLC version: 3.0.11.1
Operating System: 10.14.6
Location: Southern California

Re: VLC vs iTunes

Postby marksealey » 13 Feb 2012 18:06

Arite,

Thanks so much for your helpful reply!

The more I look into it, the less I like the idea of using iTunes. Its chief advantage to me was in not duplicating software: one player, one library would be so much simpler. But not at the expense of poorer quality.

I'm actually planning to use AirFoil to send from my iMac to an Airport Express and then into my ParaSound P3/A23 stereo system.
best
--
Mark Sealey

jltnol
New Cone
New Cone
Posts: 8
Joined: 12 Feb 2012 19:15

Re: VLC vs iTunes

Postby jltnol » 13 Feb 2012 20:27

I seem to recall testing whether any of the WiFi audio devices, including Apple, compressed the audio before sending it out over WiFi. You can do the same test by looking at the outgoing network bandwidth when playing a low bitrate mp3 file and an uncompressed 24bit Aif or Wav file.... I did this once and think I remember realizing that WiFi delivery compressed the audio when sending it out....

marksealey
New Cone
New Cone
Posts: 9
Joined: 11 Feb 2012 23:01
VLC version: 3.0.11.1
Operating System: 10.14.6
Location: Southern California

Re: VLC vs iTunes

Postby marksealey » 13 Feb 2012 20:46

Thanks; if WiFi compresses, that's a big disadvantage.
best
--
Mark Sealey


Return to “VLC media player for macOS Troubleshooting”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 31 guests