The VideoLAN Forums

So, there is an extra 5% that is weird to see. If you split the video output from the main interface, does it behave better? I think to properly answer this question I'd have to make more scientific tests. Perhaps by sampling say 5 minutes of playback of the same media and charting together with VL...

that is without the 2 modules?

Correct, the version 2.0 tests are with those 2 modules removed.

I am interested in CPU usage. But yes, video quality is better in 2.0 I made some measurements as carefully as I could, with while sleep 2 ; do ps ux -p <pid>; done Hardware: Dual 1.8GHz G5. GeForce FX 5200 AGP 64 MB Stream: H264 1280x688 24fps VLC 2.0: paused, 12% CPU; scenes of little motion, or ...

Remove libsamplerate_plugin.dylib and libspeex_resampler_plugin.dylib and tell us if that works better? That practically eliminates audio dropouts. Now I get continuous audio, with occasional video frame skips. Quite watchable, though. ... Without those modules, how is perf compared to 1.1. ? I get...

Remove libsamplerate_plugin.dylib and libspeex_resampler_plugin.dylib and tell us if that works better? That practically eliminates audio dropouts. Now I get continuous audio, with occasional video frame skips. Quite watchable, though. Again, fantastic work getting such great performance for 720p o...

another thing to mention would be that the video stays perfectly smooth. even with the audio cutting in and out, the video doesnt miss a frame On PowerPC this is also a serious problem. If I absolutely minimise other CPU consumers on my dual 1.8GHz G5 (10.5.8; GeForce FX 5200 AGP, 64 MB*), I can ge...