welcome back to the 80's when we needed the most up-to-date computer to play a single video...
I knew I had problem with my old AMD 4500+ CPU... But now I got Q6600 and it's not enough either. ;(
Off topic babbling.
I remember time when it was better to convert JPG images to GIF images before showing. It took so long time to show JPG images. ~20-30 seconds / image. (At that moment most hard drives got something like 40 megabytes of space and 286 cpu was hot!)
Also often palette was better optimized with proper conversion.
After that came MP3 it was so heavy compression. At first compressing CD to MP3 took several days. And also most of comps didn't play mp3 files directly. So it was better to convert those to wav for playing. Which wasn't either too bright idea, because most of hard drives got something like 120 megabytes of space.
When DivX came, it was quite nice. My 450 MHz Pentium just barely decoded it in time.
But yeah, since that though challenge for home comps have been video compression. It's nice to see what the challenge will be in future when we get 1000 more or even more. Now I got 1 terabyte of hard disk space and 4x 2400 MHz cores. But that's still not enough for pre-uncompression or realtime decoding with software which uses only one core. And having 4 gigabyte of memory won't help.