> > Tell that to the people...
>
> OK, but in that case, why didn't you ask them?
For one thing, many seem to prefer other media players. But you'll note that the issue I had is not with the OS - it's with the hardware I have (Intel 845-based Soyo motherboard, socket-478 pentium, on-board AC-97 audio).
> Let me rephrase what I said before: "There are very
> few people still using Win98". So even if your question
> is VLC-related (which makes it logical to ask here), it
> would be best to ask the question to the people that
> also have Win98 & can test/help.
As I say, this issue has nothing to do with which version of Windoze you have, as can be seen here:
https://forum.videolan.org/viewtopic.php?f=14&t=48799
> > KernelEx.
>
> ..yeah, I've heard about KernelEx before, but how can
> it allow you to run XP SP2+ only software?
Because it hooks into the kernel to add handles for API functions not present in the win-98 kernel.
> I haven't tested yet, but I think (& fear) that VLC 2.1.0+
> is XP SP2+ only. What version of Firefox do you have on your
> Win98?
My default browser is Firefox 2.0.0.20 - which still renders the vast majority of websites good enough to view and interact with (I'm using Bon Echo to make this post, which is FF version 2.0.0.22pre). KernelEx allows the use of much higher versions of Firefox (at least up to 9). I also have Opera version 12, and Palemoon 3.6.32. KernelEx also allows even the most current versions of Flash to run under win-98.
> I'm stuck on Firefox 12, with XP SP1, since I don't wanna install SP2 or SP3.
SP1 is horribly vulnerable to many exploits. I can't imagine what would be so valuable with SP1 to be worth using compared to, say, a fully patched/updated XP-SP3.
> Do you know of any way I can run SP2+ software on my XP SP1?
I believe that there is something similar to KernelEx for Windows 2k (to allow 2k to run XP and higher software) but with regard to XP-SP1, I would bet that XP enthusiasts wouldn't see the value in making XP-SP1 compatible with SP-2-and-higher software because they wouldn't see the value in running SP1 over SP2/SP3.